Skip to content

What I think B.C. should do about those darn paper cups

March 20, 2019

Hugely visible paper coffee cup recycling bin in downtown Manchester 2017.—courtesy of Hubbub

Here’s my hot take on what to do about all the single-use, polycoated paper coffee cup trash that lavishly illustrates my last post on the Roll up the Rim contest.

Rather than telling B.C. residents that existing polycoat paper cups are difficult or impossible to recycle—something my research indicates is not true—much more should be done to educate B.C. residents that polycoat paper cups can be recycled in their municipal recycling system.

And, of course, more should continue to be done to encourage less waste and greater recyclability of single-use food packaging.

But most importantly, I believe that the government of British Columbia should follow the best practices developed in B.C. over the last forty-plus year and use provincial legislation to create a so-called Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) program; one made up of the fast food and coffee chains—such as McDonald’s, Tim Hortons, Wendy’s, Burger King, Starbucks, Blenz, Waves—that are responsible for vending the vast majority of the single-use paper cups (both hot and cold) in B.C.

B.C. should then tell this group to clean up the mess that their paper cups have made!

Make the (paper cup) polluters pay like we have in the past

Everyone in B.C. is familiar with the province-wide Return-It recycling depot system. This is an EPR descended from the first one created by the provincial government in 1970, which saw the creation of a returnable beverage container system—self-financed out of the deposits collected at the time of sale and operated by the pop bottlers and supermarkets (among other retail members).

The EPR approach to recycling consumer goods is built on the simple principle that the polluter pays—that companies should be responsible for recycling what they are responsible for creating.

Today in B.C., at least 18 industry-based EPRs operate deposit-based, self-financing programs which help British Columbians to recycle used oil, alcoholic and non alcoholic beverage containers, batteries, light bulbs, paint, almost anything that runs on electricity, thermostats, mobile devices and tires.

The system works best where there are Return-It recycling depots large enough to act as one-stop drop-off points for many of the other EPRs. Few of B.C.’s Return-It depot take only bottles. Depot operators earn a small fee for what they accept on behalf of other EPRs, so most also accept batteries, paint and electronics, as space allows.

The logic of creating a provincially-mandated ERP to run a deposit-financed paper cup system is obvious—given the scale of paper cup waste and the success of the Encorp Pacific ERP (which operates the Return-It system).

In 2017, B.C. kept an estimated one billion beverage containers out the landfill. The provincial return rate on beverage containers hovers between 75 and 85 percent. This is substantially higher than the 72 percent Canadian average claimed by the Canadian Beverage Association (which would be that much lower without B.C.’s rate.

The U.S. beverage container recycling rate is 33 and 70 percent, for states without container deposit systems and states with, respectively.

Putting a province-wide deposit (say a nickel) on paper cups that be redeemed through the Return-It Depot system would simply make paper cup garbage disappear, as if by magic. (although really, it would be by binners and dumpster divers.)

The only thing that isn’t so obvious to me is why a provincial paper cup deposit system wasn’t instituted many years ago, although the obvious reticence of the BC Liberal government to impose regulations on big business offers a clue.

Alternately, a paper cup ERP could follow the practice of the many non-beverage container ERPs and choose to finance itself with a smaller, non-returnable recycling fee (say three cents).

By itself the ERP could collect paper cups by:

  • Separating and encouraging in-store disposal of paper products in a standardized way across all ERP member stores;
  • Encouraging B.C. residents to bring paper cups to Return-It depots without offering them a deposit, as with plastic milk jugs;
  • Installing distinctive, high-visibility paper cup bins in selected high traffic areas;

However, the return rate would be fractional compared to what the free, motivated workforce of the province’s binners could dig up.

A possible case in point is the trial paper cup collection program carried out in 2015-16, in the city of Manchester, England, by an environmental nonprofit group called Hubbub, with funding from eight of the city’s major coffee cup retailers.

The program, called #1MoreShot, ran four months, from October 2016 to February 2017.

For the first six weeks a single collection bin was installed on a high traffic street. This bin attracted plenty of public and media attention but not plenty of paper cups. Organizers had to modify the bin to make it easier to put cups in and harder to vandalize.

For the rest of the trial, ten more bins were added, some on the street and some on the Manchester Metropolitan University campus. Key findings (quoted largely verbatim from the Hubbub report which was emailed directly to me) were:

  • Street bins are effective at attracting attention and raising awareness that an initiative is taking place.
  • Street bins do not collect high volumes of cups and are far more prone to contamination (20 percent) than those bins located in more managed locations such as the University campus (12 percent contamination).
  • When all bins were removed from the street and transferred to managed locations (e.g. University campus, hospital cafes) usage of the bins doubled.
  • Contamination of the bins was significantly reduced if they were placed next to a general waste bin.
  • Indoor locations proved preferable to outdoor locations, even in managed environments.
  • Clear, simple messaging alongside the bin and at the point where the drink is consumed was effective at encouraging use and reducing contamination.

By the end of January 31st, 2016, the Manchester trial had collected 21,000 paper cups, demonstrating, as far as Hubbub was concerned, that the public is willing to recycle their cups if facilities are provided.

As this works out to less than 200 cups per day, it could also have been taken to suggest that such bins alone cannot solve the problem of paper cup waste, any more than the on-street Return-It blue bins, that have been peppered throughout Vancouver since 2013 are doing much to add to the return rate of beverage containers.

If, as Encorp Pacific says, 90 percent of returned beverage containers are brought directly to Return-It depots, then its sidewalk blue bin can only be collecting some portion of the remaining 10 percent. In fact, all I every see them collecting on West Broadway is garbage and graffiti tags.

B.C. needs to harness the power of binners

No substitute for a binner. Return-It street bin in the 1400 block of West Broadway, on March 21st.

Compared to the 21,000 paper cups that the #OneMoreShot campaign took four months to collect in 2016-17, consider the results of the Vancouver Binner’s Project annual Coffee Cup Revolution one afternoon in October of 2017.

In three hours, 120 binners brought in 53,783 coffee cups. At 5 cents a cup, they received a payout of $3,652.75

It should be said that, according to Hubbub, phase one of its second paper cup collecting initiative, called #SquareMileChallenge, which took place in London, England, beginning in spring of 2017 and which leveraged all of Hubbub’s Manchester experience, collected a whopping half a million cups in just the month of April!

But, extrapolating the 2017 Coffee Cup Revolution numbers over a month of 30 days shows that, in the same amount of time, Vancouver binners would collect well over 1.6 million paper cups. So yeah, binners still win.

I don’t know yet, if Hubbub’s #SquareMileChallenge made its end-of-2017 target to collect five million paper cups but if so, the experience and expertise gathered in the process could be invaluable to other cities, such as Vancouver.

Even Hubbub’s Manchester trial indicates that the cup bins, which were cleverly made to look like squat takeaway cups, were valuable conversation starters and earned the project enormous media attention.

If nothing else, a small, strategically-located number of similarly eye-catching bins—in combination with a deposit system that pays people for collecting and bringing in paper cups—could have a beneficial impact by helping raise and maintain public awareness.

Even absent of any other additional paper cup recycling initiatives, I think that the City of Vancouver should bang out three our four similarly photogenic, paper cup return bins and stick them near the highest concentrations of office workers and fast food and coffee shops downtown—just to generate some buzz.

Arguably, the lack of any real effort on the part of the City of Vancouver, to raise public awareness about the existing options for recycling paper cups has helped insure that our used paper cups runneth over the streets and sidewalks and everywhere else they don’t belong. Click the images to enlarge them.

  1. Wow! Very thorough, informative article, Stanley, thank you! 👍


    • Thank you. This is an odd post that I began in frustration and more than a bit of anger. But there was no way I could just dash it off. I had to cool off and write methodically. Toward the end I considered included even more detail but I was getting a little cross-eyed by that point.


  2. You’re totally right about the need for ERP — and of course corporations will stonewall every step of the way…


  3. Nakota Ridge permalink

    Stanley I hope you submit your posts to the municipalities, provincial govts and federal to put a ring in their ears and wake them up. God Bless You, Stanley😊🤩🤗😘


    • Thanks. I continue to educate myself about the provincial governmental mechanics involved in creating Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) programs. And at least one of B.C.’s EPRs — the Call2Recycle battery program — operates across Canada. In the latter case, I can take a very small bit of credit for helping encourage the B.C. chain of London Drugs to make every one of its locations capable of accepting and safely handling puffy and otherwise damaged lithium-ion batteries, which pose a risk of having a runaway thermal event and which normal Call2Recycle participants wont’t touch with a 10 foot pole!

      I would ultimately like to get the relevant B.C. ministry to respond directly to the issue of creating an EPR for paper cups.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. DJP permalink

    A few years ago the news hour had a segment that featured a couple of binners that sat on a park bench at kits beach with their shopping carts near by. (I wonder if they might have salted the carts with a few empty pop cans)The upshot was that instead of going into the trash cans for the recyclables the recyclables were deposited in the carts. Now to tackle cigarette butts and coffee cups. You would think that Vancouver with its endless endevours to be clean and green would somehow enlist binners to aid in the clean up. My seem to remember a specialized cart being proposed . Next thing you will need to take a safe binners course to qualify for your binners license. The license will be expensive and they will only issue 200 of them. They will be resold and a premium….. you gotta love capitalism


    • The specialized cart you may be referring to is the ungainly-looking “Universal Cart” that the Binner’s Project has been working on — apparently as part of a cart-share scheme. Personally, I think the Return-It depots should host blue “Return-It-branded shopping carts for binners to use (they could even have ads on them.

      As recycling moves more into the private sector I expect the blue bin-type, multi source systems — where residents pre-sort — to be replaced by single source systems — where all recyclables go in a single, dumpster-size receptacle, for post-sorting at the dumping end. A few Emterra-branded single source recycling dumpmsters have already appeared in Vancouver. These are difficult for binners to go through — especially if they are locked. Wide-spread single source would nearly be the end of binning.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Slowcrow permalink

      Brilliant!!! Cups AND butts!!! A win-win for everybody! You made my day!!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: